Page 2 of 2
the use of 'out' in a parameter list / situation
Posted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 6:36 pm
by lumberjack
Hi Phil,
Think you have summed it up quite nicely.
Maybe look at a string example, where the sRef have to be initialized before the call. Remember numbers default to Zero.
Johan
the use of 'out' in a parameter list / situation
Posted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 8:14 pm
by Phil Hepburn
Hi Johan,
I actually tried the strings first, but thought I had too many images to post. I also thought that int and string would be different since we can have a nullable ints but that strings don't - and a default would be an empty string.
Please feel free to add your knowledgeable details to these captured images :-
- RefOut_11.jpg (29.93 KiB) Viewed 270 times
- RefOut_12.jpg (29.92 KiB) Viewed 270 times
- RefOut_13.jpg (24.87 KiB) Viewed 270 times
- RefOut_14.jpg (36.13 KiB) Viewed 270 times
- RefOut_15.jpg (30.98 KiB) Viewed 270 times
- RefOut_16.jpg (39.42 KiB) Viewed 270 times
- RefOut_17.jpg (50.21 KiB) Viewed 270 times
Hope this interests a few guys,
Cheers,
Phil.
the use of 'out' in a parameter list / situation
Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2017 7:05 am
by lumberjack
Hi Phil,
Think you can maybe just show the warning message when cRef is not initialized in the calling block before passed into the calling method/func/proc.
Johan
the use of 'out' in a parameter list / situation
Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2017 11:55 am
by Phil Hepburn
Hi Johan,
An earlier message of yours suggested that I needed to do more than I seemed able at this end.
Is it that the X# version works differently to what you are referring to ? As regards Ref and Out variable inputs.
It seems possible for me to pass in Ref and Out, both of which have not been assigned a value, just declared as a value type. I get no errors for this - see below :-
- RefOut_21.jpg (51.26 KiB) Viewed 270 times
- RefOut_22.jpg (53.37 KiB) Viewed 270 times
When I tried it with INTs the results were as if the default of zero was applied.
What exactly do you wish me to do ?
Here are the inputs and results for DateTimes - it would appear that unassigned inputs to Ref and Out are given a default DateTime of 0001, 01, 01 00:00:00.
Check these small images :-
- RefOut_23.jpg (23.17 KiB) Viewed 270 times
- RefOut_24.jpg (50.87 KiB) Viewed 270 times
- RefOut_25.jpg (51.73 KiB) Viewed 270 times
So as far as I can tell the compiler supplies default values if values don't exist.
Is this what you needed to know?
This behaviour could be a real "catch you out" (or 'gotcha' as Willie says) I feel - what do you think ?
Best regards,
Phil.
the use of 'out' in a parameter list / situation
Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2017 12:34 pm
by lumberjack
Hi Phil,
Sorry just tested now and seems the compiler by default set string to "" even if not specified /v02.
What I tried to highlight is that it might be dangerous if not initialized:
Code: Select all
FUNCTION Start() AS VOID
LOCAL o AS MyClass
RefClassTest(o)
?o:RefValue
RETURN
FUNCTION RefClassTest(o REF MyClass) AS VOID
o:RefValue := "Foo"
RETURN
CLASS MyClass
EXPORTED RefValue AS STRING
CONSTRUCTOR(v AS STRING)
SELF:RefValue := v
RETURN
END CLASS
You can try the following with a NULL string though and it will fail at runtime:
Code: Select all
FUNCTION Start() AS VOID
LOCAL s AS STRING
TestRef(s)
?s
RETURN
FUNCTION TestRef(s REF STRING) AS VOID
IF s:Length > 0
s := "String length > 0"
ELSE
s := "String length = 0"
ENDIF
RETURN